Phillips NV Claims That A Third-Party Cleaning Solution Is The Cause Of Their Sound Abatement Foam Degrading

Phillips faces a $200 million lawsuit after blaming their products malfunction on the manufacturers of a third-party cleaning solution

Thursday, October 14, 2021 - Phillips NV may be digging their defective sleep apnea device liability hole much deeper by blaming a third party for causing their sleep apnea machines to malfunction. It has been reported that SoClean Inc., the company that manufactures cleaning liquid used to clean recalled Phillips sleep apnea devices, has filed a lawsuit to combat the accusation being made against them by the embattled company. Phillips is accused of falsely blaming the recall of 3 million of their sleep apnea machines on the machine's cleaning products rather than on the sleep apnea device's inherent design flaws. According to Reuters, "Dutch medical equipment company Koninklijke Philips NV has been hit with a $200 million lawsuit accusing them of deceiving the public and the healthcare industry by falsely linking the problems with its recently recalled sleep-apnea machines to ozone-based cleaning methods". Phillips CPAP sleep apnea machines have been recalled because the insulative foam used to quiet the machine's motor degrades and causes toxic, carcinogenic particles, chemicals, and gasses directly into the device's airway where it is inhaled into the lungs continuously throughout the night. SoClean alleges that their cleaning solution is being falsely blamed by Phillips for causing the soundproofing foam to degrade. The CEO of Phillips has stated before the company directors that the SoClean Ozone products were not approved and should not be used on any of their products and is the cause of the sound abatement foam degrading. An executive at SoClean says that the Phillips claims are baseless and an attempt to deflect blame from their defective device. They also said that SoClean has suffered hundreds of millions of dollars in lost sales and damage to their reputation as a result of the slander.

CPAP cancer lawsuits against Phillip NV accuse them of bringing a faulty medical device to market. Plaintiffs that have filed suit claim that they have developed many different types of lung disorders from using the device, like "chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, and other respiratory side effects, after breathing chemicals from deteriorating sound abatement foam, " according to About Lawsuits.com. The website quotes the plaintiff as saying, "After using the sleep apnea machine nightly between May 2017 and June 2021, Hogan (the plaintiff) indicates she began to experience chronic bronchitis, COPD, sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension, severe headaches and was diagnosed with pneumonia at least three times." The lawsuit blames the degradation of the PE-PUR sound abatement foam and inhaling carcinogens as the cause of her condition. The woman alleges she was not warned, nor suspected that her medical device was defective. It was not until she read reports like this did she become suspicious.

The Insurance Journal tells readers to expect "potentially massive litigation over the recalled Philips sleep apnea machines." More than 100 lawsuits have been filed and are being coordinated through multidistrict litigation in federal court in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, the home of Phillips's main CPAP manufacturing facilities. The honorable U.S. District Judge Joy Conti is presiding.

More Recent Philips CPAP Cancer Lawsuit News:

• Results of Phillips-Funded Studies Call The Use of Ozone Cleaning Products Into Question | 7/20/2022
• Phillips CPAP Malfunctions And Using An Ozone Cleaning Solution May Go Hand In Hand | 7/10/2022
• SoClean Cleaning Solution Is Accused Of Being Unsafe And May Have Contributed To Phillips CPAP Malfunction | 7/2/2022
• Bloomberg Alleges Phillips Knew Of The Health Hazards From Sound Abatement Foam Years Before The CPAP Recall | 6/14/2022
• The FDA Is Recalling 55,000 Ventilators Made By Phillips Respironica | 6/7/2022
• Phillips Respironics Sleep Apnea Machine Recall Falls Far Short Of Expectations | 6/3/2022
• People Are Dying From Cancer And Suing Phillips Respironics For Negligence Leading To Personal Injury | 5/24/2022
• A Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claims The Foam Manufacturer Is Liable For Using Substandard Material | 5/9/2022
• A Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claims The Foam Manufacturer Is Liable For Using Substandard Material | 5/9/2022
• Sleep Apnea Patients From The Cleveland Clinic Want To Know When To Expect Their DreamStation Sleep Apnea Machine Replacement | 4/28/2022
• Unapproved Ozone Cleaning Contraptions May Be A More Likely Cause of CPAP Airway Contamination | 4/20/2022
• Phillips CPAP Lawsuits Allege The Machine Causes Varying Degrees of Respiratory Illnesses | 4/5/2022
• Medical Device Suppliers Are Filing Phillips CPAP Sleep Apnea Lawsuits | 3/29/2022
• The US Food And Drug Administration Considers The Phillips CPAP Recall Efforts To Be Ineffective | 3/18/2022
• Phillips Respironics May Not Have A Suitable Solution To Their Defective Sleep Apnea Devices | 2/25/2022
• Phillips Telling Patients To Consult With Their Physicians Before Discontinuing Using The Recalled Sleep Apnea Device | 2/21/2022
• US Government Regulators Acknowledge The Serious Nature Of The Phillips CPAP Cancer Recall With Class 1 Recall | 2/11/2022
• Phillips Respironics And SoClean Inc. May Have To Share Responsibility For CPAP User Cancer | 2/7/2022
• Phillips Respironics Waited Too Recall Sleep Apnea Machines And Their Customers Died As A Result | 2/2/2022
• The FDA Thinks The Phillips CPAP Machines May Lead To Developing Deadly Forms of Cancer | 1/28/2022
• The FDA Tells CPAP Users That SoClean Ozone Cleaning Solutions Are Not Legally Marketed | 1/14/2022
• Sleep Apnea May Affect Millions More Than Those Using CPAP Devices | 1/10/2022
• Phillips Delayed The CPAP Recall Until Another Device Could Be Sold To Consumers | 1/4/2022
• FDA Accusations Of A Coverup Will Be Hard For Phillips To Dismiss | 12/29/2021
• A Women Allegedly Developed Breast Cancer From Using The Phillips CPAP Sleep Apnea Machine | 12/22/2021
• Phillips And SoClean May Be Forced To Share Legal Responsibility For Failing To Warn Consumers | 12/16/2021
• Royal Phillips Versus SoClean Inc. Could Determine The Outcome Of DreamStation CPAP Lawsuits | 12/1/2021
• Recalled Phillips Sleep Apnea Devices Could Approach 15 Million Units Or More | 11/24/2021
• Sleep Apnea Patients Look To Replace Their Recalled Phillips CPAP Machine Since Phillips Seems Incapable | 11/17/2021
• Ozone Cleaning Products Are Not FDA Approved And May Be Responsible For CPAP Foam Insulation Breakdown | 11/12/2021
• CPAP Plaintiffs Suffer Anxiety From Not Knowing How Severe Their Lung Problems May Be | 11/8/2021
• New Lawsuits Allege CPAP User Developed Pancreatic Cancer From Using the DreamStation CPAP device | 11/1/2021
• Sleep Apnea Patients Continue To Use Their CPAP Device Because They Are Unable To Function The Next Day Without It | 10/27/2021
• Problems Mount For Royal Phillips From Multiple Sources Over CPAP Machine Malfunctions | 10/23/2021
• Royal Phillips Battles SoClean For Responsibility In Causing Lung Disease And Disorders | 10/19/2021
• The US Attorney General Is Concerned Phillips Is Failing To Deliver a Timely CPAP Solution | 10/11/2021
• A Sleep Apnea Doctor Offers Sound Advice For Patients In The Wake Of The Phillips CPAP Recall | 10/5/2021
• Sleep Apnea Problems Continue For Millions Affected By The CPAP recall | 9/29/2021
• Phillips DreamStation CPAP Turns Into a Nightmare For Millions of Users | 9/27/2021
• Phillips CPAP DreamStation Cancer Could Go Undetected For A Decade | 9/23/2021
• The Phillips Sleep Apnea Device Recall Includes Both Life-Supporting and Non-Life Supporting Models | 9/17/2021
• Phillips CPAP Stockholders Were Tipped Off About CPAP Failures More Than A Month Before Millions of Users | 9/14/2021
• The Phillips Sleep Apnea Machine Recall And Replace Affects Mostly US Owners | 9/9/2021
• Phillips CPAP Sleep Apnea Device Recall Will Begin Soon But Could Take One Year To Complete | 9/6/2021
• Phillips CPAP Users May Have A Replacement Device Coming Within The Next Several Months | 9/1/2021
• FDA Recall Classification of Phillips CPAP Devices Is The One Reserved For The Most Worrisome Medical Devices | 8/26/2021
• Charities Re-Purpose Non-Essential Sleep Apnea Machines Into Covid-19 Ventilators | 8/24/2021
• The Life or Death Demand Created By The Delta Variant Of Covid-19 Magnifies The Need For Safe Ventilators | 8/20/2021
• Former Phillips CPAP Users May Not Get A Replacement For Months | 8/18/2021
• You May Have Sleep Apnea And Not Know It | 8/16/2021
• Lawsuits Are Being Filed By People That Have Developed Cancer From Using The Phillips Sleep Apnea Device | 8/11/2021

Lawyers for CPAP Cancer Lawsuits

We will represent all persons in involved in a BiPAP or CPAP cancer lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning there are never any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. Anyone who developed cancer or another serious side effect as a result of using a Philips CPAP sleep apnea machine or ventilator in --or is a family member of such a person--is eligible to receive a free, no-obligation case review from our attorneys. Simply contact our firm through the online contact form or the chat feature and one of our Philips BiPAP cancer lawyers serving will contact you promptly to discuss your case.